NC/JCM’s writes to Cabinet Secretary reg. revision of pension
Ph: 23382286
National Council (Staff Side)
Joint Consultative Machinery
For Central Government Employees
13-C, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi-110001
E mail: nc.jcm.np@gmail.com
No.NC/JCM/2016
Dated: July 16,2016
Hon’ble Finance Minister,
Ministry of Finance
(Govt of India )
North Block
New Delhi
Respected Sir,
Sub: Revision of Pension
This issue of acceptance of Option-I (or) II was discussed with your good self at the residence of Hon’ble Home Minister (Government of India), Wherein Hon’ble Minister for Railways and Hon’ble MOSR were present, by the Staff Side National Council (JCM). You had categorically agreed on our demand that, no dilution would be made in the options given to the Pensioners by the VII CPC. It is unfortunate that, a rider, “subject to feasibility”, has been imposed in Option-I.
Sir, this is very unfair and we will appreciate if you kindly get the sentence “subject to feasibility” removed from that para to keep your promise also. It should be left to the Pensioners that whatsoever option they want to choose, they should be allowed to Opt. The argument of non-availability of record is misleading and should not be given any cognizance because PPOs of the Pensioners are the base record and is available with the organizations concerned.
We earnestly seek your urgent intervention in this regard to avoid unnecessary hardship to millions of Pensioners.
With Kind Regards!
Sincerely yours,
(SHIVA GOPAL MISHRA)
Secretary(Staff Side)
Source: http://ncjcmstaffside.com/
Debosree Chatterjee says
We the pensioner’s condition are tragic moreover. We family pensioner who gets 30% pension myself drawing my father’s pension as I am unemployed/unmarried, thus we are in verge of death but our so called Hon’ble Ministers do not realise our agonies as they have house, Car/s, Bank balances all medical supports, and enjoying all luxuries but we I’ll fated pensioners have to starve without food, no medical, if can’t pay rent then landlords throw us out let our ministers come and suffer all these in our place I think then only they will realise that those who draw 30% pension that also Pre -2006 the amount which comes every month in our bank a meagre one although my late father was a Class I Gazzetted Officer. Whereas a juniou staffs daughter draws more times of pension as her father was retired after 2006 but when fixation time come her pension also get multiplied as 2.57 and my pension also.
Vijayan nair says
Option2 will defenetly high and why to opt 1
khushalchandbhagat says
Làck of communication between pensioners and system is there to chose proper option 1or 2